Steve Jobs and his team sure did a great job of getting out the iPad.. And what a wonderful price point.
However, there are some things that the iPad v1.0 lack. As with the original iPod and the iPhone 2G, the most desirable features will surely show up in iPad v2.0
Shortcomings of the iPad:
-- No camera. Thus no way to video chat using Fring. And why hasnt Apple bundled its own iChat and Photobooth with the iPad.
-- No multitasking. Maybe we would have to jailbreak the iPad again to use the Backgrounder.
-- iPhone control. Somehow, I want to be able to make calls from my iPad through my iPhone. Somehow..
-- Support for the Mac OS X apps. Sure the App Store apps are fun. But I think that they are just that - fun. I want to be able to do serious work on the iPad. It would be the only device I would carry to my office.
-- Bluetooth headset support. Just picture this situation where you want to voice chat with a friend over Fring. Would you hold up the iPad up to your lips (as if sipping from a plate) ??
 To the young programmers of the World! The cry of the rebellion we launch here, in which we firmly implant our ideals alongside those of the Futurist painters, does not come from a little aesthetic minded clique but, on the contrary, expresses the violent desire that seethes in the veins of every creative programmer today. We want to fight to the bitter end against the fanatical, thoughtless, and purely snobbish religious faith in the past, stoked by the nefarious existence of the academic journals. We are rebelling against the sluggishly supine admiration for old operating systems, old languages, archaic standards, and against the enthusiasm for everything bug-ridden, rotting with code bloat, and eaten away by obsolescence. And we judge unjust - criminal in fact - the habitual disdain for programs whose construction is different and original, new, throbbing with life. Comrades! We declare to you that triumphant progress in the other sciences has brought about, in humanity as a whole, changes so profound as to dredge out an abyss between the past and us free creatures who are securely confident in the radiant magnificence of the future. We are nauseated by the despicable sloth that, ever since the 1970's, has let our programmers survive only through an incessant reprogramming of the glories of the past. For the professionals of other disciplines, programming is still a land of the dead, an immense Pompeii still whitening with sepulchers. But programming is being reborn, and in the wake of its political resurgence an intellectual resurgence is taking place. In the expressways of our teeming cities, the pistons of our automobiles are fired by the spark of microprocessors. In the land of the couch potatoes, computers control the appliances of our daily existence. In the fields of traditional technology one is struck today by a new elan, by lightning-bright inspirations of something utterly new. Only that programming is vital which finds its own elements in the people who use it. Our forbearers drew material for their programming from the religious atmosphere weighing heavily on their programs. We must now draw out inspiration from the tangible miracles of contemporary life, from the portable CD players that bring digital music to the masses, from the supersonic airplanes which achieve speed of flight through lightness of weight, the portable television sets which are available throughout the world and boot in less time than any computer system, from the convulsive struggle for the conquest of the unknown. Then too, how can we remain indifferent to the frenetic activity of the great cities, to the utterly new psychology of programming that takes wing only after dark, to the febrile figures of the viveur, the cocotte, the hacker, the addicts to coffee? Because we propose to play our part in the badly needed renewal of all expressions of programming, we resolutely declare war against all those programmers and against all those institutions that, however they may camouflage themselves in raiment of pseudo-modernity, remain mired in tradition, in academicism, in a repugnant mental laziness. We call on all young programmers to unleash their scorn on the whole lot of brainless canaille who in Computer Science applaud a sick-making reflorescence of spineless classicism; who in MIT praise to the skies the neurotic cultists of network-transparent window systems - a hermaphroditic archaism; who in computer companies heap financial rewards on a pedestrian and blind manual skill a la 1974; who in Berkeley adulate programming typical of pensioned-off government functionaries; and in IBM glorify a farraginous rubbish heap turned out by fossilized alchemists! In short, we rise up against the superficiality, banality, and slovenly, corner-workshop facility that makes most of the widely respected computer programmers in every region of Silicon Valley worthy, instead, of the deepest contempt. Out with you, then, bought-and-sold rewriters of hack programs! Out with you, archeologists infected with chronic necrophilia! Out, atavistic executives, you complaisant panderers! Out, gouty academics, besotted and ignorant professors! Out! Go ask the high priests of the True Cult, those guardians of Structured Programming Rules where the works of Henry Massalin are to be seen today; ask them why the official operating systems do not even recognize the existence of self modifying code; ask them where the art of User Interface is appreciated at its true worth! . . . And who takes the trouble to think about the programmers who don't have twenty years of struggles and sufferings behind them but nonetheless are preparing works destined to bring honor to the homeland? Oh no, those critics ever ready to sell themselves have very different interests to defend! The eXhibitions, the standards cartels, and the superficial and never-disinterested purchasing departments are what condemn the programming art to what is, plainly speaking prostitution! And what should we say about the "Experts"? Come, come! Let's make an end once and for all to the layerists, the extensabilitists, the toolkit mongers, the librarians - We have put up with them quite enough, with all those impotent programmers of useless software! Let us make an end also to the wasters of disk space who clutter up our machines and profane our lightning-fast memories! An end to the quick-money architecture of the jobbers of the prefabricated! An End to the common run of program decorators, the fakers of technology, the masters of software cosmetology who sell themselves, and the slovenly and thick headed "managers"! And here are our CONCLUSIONS resolute and in a nutshell. With our enthusiastic adherence to Futurism we aim: 1. To destroy the cult of the past, the obsession with all things old, academic pedantry, and formalism 2. To cast our scorn profoundly on every last form of imitation 3. To exalt every form of originality, even if foolhardy, even if extremely violent 4. To bear bravely and proudly the smear of "madness" with which they try to gag all innovators 5. To look on the lot of computer "scientists" as at one and the same time useless and dangerous 6. To rebel against the tyranny of the words "extensible" and "reusable" expressions so elastic that they can just as easily be used to demolish the art of Atkinson, Baumgart and Deutsch as well 7. To sweep out of the mental field of programming all themes and subjects already exploited 8. To render and magnify the life of today, incessantly and tumultuously transformed by science triumphant Let the dead be buried in the deepest bowels of the earth! Let the future's threshold be swept clean of mummies! Make way for the young, the violent, the headstrong! Painter Umberto Boccioni (Milan) June 15, 1991 This manifesto is based on:
 |
Why not have a plugin for WinAmp / iTunes / VLC which fiddles with the equalizer settings ??
Now see...songs bought from the iTunes Store have full metadata in them...and generally most other songs too have their metadata within them...However, I am concerned with only the genre of the song.
Why not have an EQ which shall set itself according to the genre of the song being played ??...When a rock is on...set the EQ to Rock...during a BackStreet Boys song...set it to Blues...and so on..
What say you ..??
My professor of C++ says that nowadays there are extremely few projects that are executed using C++...Very few companies are running projects that require system level programming...Programming that requires deep understanding of the interrelationship between the hardware and the software...
This has been the popular opinion for quite some years now...and application development is the sexiest tag a programmer can ask for...making apps was where the moolah lay...
Yet...there are many situations today which prove that system programming is very much in the know...and that fundamental changes that are required in certain fields are accomplished only by system programming...
True innovation, I believe, is driven by the evolution of how low level software converses with the hardware...if we can innovate at this level...if greater performance is extracted at the lower levels...then apps naturally run better and perform better...
Truly pathbreaking devices that are in the news today are the result of awesome system programming...that is...writing software that controls the hardware very tightly...
The OLPC required great amounts of code rewriting to give the end user the benefits of low-power and low-cost computing. Although the OS is based on Linux...it is a highly customized edition that runs as the frontend...
Next...the Asus eeePC...the thin white 7-inch netbook pioneered by Asus...although the hardware is not new as is presumed...the reason behind the high success of the eeePC is the highly intuitive Linux edition that it runs on...The software makes it friggin easy to use even for grandma..!!
Next in line...is the highly desirable iPhone...As it is understood by very few...the true high points of iPhone lie not in its hardware...but in its UI and software...The iPhone runs a mobile version of the most sophisticated OS in the world...Mac OS X. And engineers at Apple have been constantly laboring on the OS since Steve Jobs took the stage in 1997...
Although these are but 3 examples...I have to tell you that I am writing this off-the-cuff...deeper thinking will reveal many more...
And making apps will continue to remain sexy...but they remain sexy because of the groundlevel innovations and feats of engineering...
Posts
